Print ISSN:-2394-4781

Online ISSN:-2394-4994


Current Issue

Year 2020

Volume: 7 , Issue: 2

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 682

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 213

Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia

“Attenuation of haemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation using IV lidocaine versus IV cloridine”

Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Author Details : Rama Krishna Reddy Mudiganti, Rishita Reddy Magam, Rambabu T

Volume : 3, Issue : 2, Year : 2016

Article Page : 224-232

Suggest article by email


Background: Haemodynamic changes such as hypertension and tachycardia due to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation are well known, which are not tolerated by some patients with history of Hypertension, CAD. To attenuate these responses many drugs have been tried.
Aim: To compare the efficacy of IV cloridine in attenuating of haemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy & endotracheal intubation in comparison with IV plain lidocaine.
Design: Randomised controlled study.
Material & Method: The study includes 100 patients, randomly divided into 2 groups. Group L (50 patients) were given IV Lignocaine and Group C (50 patients) IV Cloridine was given.
Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics and independent & paired sample ‘t’ tests.
Results & Conclusion: Cloridine in the dose of 3μg/kg IV, given 15 minutes before laryngoscopy and intubation can be a better alternative than IV lidocaine 1.5mg/kg 3 minutes before laryngoscopy and intubation, in attenuating the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation without any side effects. In addition Cloridine also has other advantages such as decrease in the requirement of inhalational agents, desirable sedation etc.

IV lidocaine versus IV Cloridine Haemodynamic changes, Layngoscopy, Intubation, Cloridine Lidocaine

How to cite : Mudiganti R K R, Magam R R, Rambabu T, “Attenuation of haemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation using IV lidocaine versus IV cloridine”. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2016;3(2):224-232

Copyright © 2016 by author(s) and Indian J Clin Anaesth. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) (