COVID-19 Update - This is to inform you that the Government of India has announced a complete lockdown in India 22nd March 2020 to 3rd May 2020. As a result, our offices will now be closed till 3rd May 2020 and all our employees will be working from home. Office telephones will not be answered, and therefore you are requested to direct all your queries related to manuscript submission, review process, publication etc. at below mentioned details. editor@innovativepublication.com, rakesh.its@gmail.com, Mob. 8826373757, 8826859373, 9910947804


Print ISSN:-2394-4781

Online ISSN:-2394-4994

CODEN : IJCACT

Current Issue

Year 2020

Volume: 7 , Issue: 2

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 680

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 224

Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia


A randomized double blind comparative study on onset time and intubating conditions achieved with succinylcholine 1.5mg/kg and Rocuronium 0.6mg/kg & 0.9mg/kg IV


Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


Author Details : S. Mahalakshmi, VJ Karthik, NV Madhava Krishna, A. Niranjan Kumar

Volume : 4, Issue : 4, Year : 2017

Article Page : 476-479


Suggest article by email

Abstract

 Introduction: A perfect setting for tracheal intubation include a rapid onset, and short duration of action. These requirements are best met by succinylcholine, an ultrashort acting depolarizing muscle relaxant. However its many unwanted side effects have necessitated a search for an alternative drug. Rocuronium bromide is a steroid, non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent with a rapid onset and an intermediate duration of action. It may be a suitable alternative to succinylcholine.
Aim of Study: To study and compare the efficacy of rocuronium bromide in two dosage schedules – 0.6mg / kg (2 x ED95) and 0.9mg / kg (3 x ED95) IV, with succinylcholine chloride 1.5mg / kg IV in patients with respect to:
1.        Intubating conditions at one minute
2.        Onset of action
3.        Adverse effects
Materials and Method: This study was conducted at Government Stanley Hospital, Chennai, in the patients undergoing general surgical procedures. After institutional approval and informed consent, 60 patients were enrolled in the study.
Group A: Succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg (Sch 1.5)
Group B: Rocuronium bromide 0.6 mg/kg (2 x ED 95)(Roc 0.6)
Group C: Rocuronium bromide 0.9 mg/kg (3 x ED 95)(Roc 0.9)
Anaesthesia was induced with Thiopentone sodium 5mg/kg over a period of 20 seconds. The ulnar nerve was stimulated at the wrist using 0.1 Hz single twitch stimulation mode and the supramaximal current was determined. Once a control twitch height was established the bolus of randomly assigned neuromuscular blocking agent was administered intravenously in less than 5 seconds. When injection was completed, a timer was started and after 20 seconds the ulnar nerve was stimulated using single twitch mode at a frequency of 1 Hz. At one minute, intubation was performed and scored by a blinded experienced anaesthesiologist. anaesthesia was maintained with Nitrous oxide, oxygen and Neuromuscular blocking agents.
Results and Observations: Vocal cord relaxation is comparable between group a and c. Excellent intubating conditions was seen with Group A (Sch 1.5mg/kg) with 100% score. Excellent intubating conditions with Group B (Roc 0.6 mg/kg) and Group C are 30% and 85% respectively. P value of Succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg and Rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg is 0.466 statistically not significant.
Conclusion: Succinylcholine is an ideal agent for intubation in all surgical procedures. Intubating conditions of Rocuronium bromide at a dose of 0.9mg/kg (3xED95) is comparable to Succinylcholine 1.5mg/kg at 1minute.Rocuronium bromide 0.9 mg/kg can be used safely in patients where Succinylcholine is contraindicated.

Keywords: Neuromuscular blocker, Rocuronium, Succinylcholine, Hemodynamics, Intubating conditions

How to cite : Mahalakshmi S, Karthik V, Krishna N M, Kumar A N, A randomized double blind comparative study on onset time and intubating conditions achieved with succinylcholine 1.5mg/kg and Rocuronium 0.6mg/kg & 0.9mg/kg IV. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2017;4(4):476-479

Copyright © 2017 by author(s) and Indian J Clin Anaesth. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) (creativecommons.org)