COVID-19 Update - This is to inform you that the Government of India has announced a complete lockdown in India 22nd March 2020 to 3rd May 2020. As a result, our offices will now be closed till 3rd May 2020 and all our employees will be working from home. Office telephones will not be answered, and therefore you are requested to direct all your queries related to manuscript submission, review process, publication etc. at below mentioned details.,, Mob. 8826373757, 8826859373, 9910947804

Print ISSN:-2394-4781

Online ISSN:-2394-4994


Current Issue

Year 2020

Volume: 7 , Issue: 1

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 627

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 225

Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia

A prospective randomised comparative study of proseal LMA, I-gel and endotracheal tube in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Author Details : Ravindra Kumar Gehlot, Shekhar Suman Saxena, Lalit Kumar Raiger

Volume : 5, Issue : 1, Year : 2018

Article Page : 43-49

Suggest article by email


Introduction: The major responsibility of the anesthesiologist is to provide adequate ventilation to the patient because airway related problems are still the most common cause of anaesthesia related morbidity and mortality. The use of I-gel has been reported in laparoscopic surgeries and was found equally effective ventilatory device as PLMA. Therefore, we planned this study to compare I-gel and PLMA with ET tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 90 patients of both sex, 18-60 years age, ASA grade I-II, scheduled for elective laproscopic surgery under general anaesthesia. All patients were randomised into three groups of 30 patients each; Group I (I-gel), Group P (PLMA), Group E (ET Tube). Attempts of insertion of devices, effective airway time and easiness of gastric tube; hemodynamic parameters (HR, MAP, SpO2 and EtCO2) were recorded.
Results: There was significantly less 2nd attempt required in I-gel group(10%) as compared with ET tube (36.7%) and PLMA (13.3%),(p=0.019). Laryngopharyngeal morbidity were significantly more in Group E as compared to Group P and I (p<0.05). Hemodynamic changes were significantly higher in Group E immediately after intubation which persisted for 3 minutes and immediately after extubation (p= 0.00).
Conclusion: Supraglottic Airway Devices (PLMA and I-gel) were as effective as ET tube in establishing airway and the haemodynamic stability is better then ET tube in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Keywords: Endotracheal tube, Proseal LMA, I-gel, Laproscopic cholecystectomy, Supraglottic Airway Devices.

Doi : 10.18231/2394-4994.2018.0008

How to cite : Gehlot R K, Saxena S S, Raiger L K, A prospective randomised comparative study of proseal LMA, I-gel and endotracheal tube in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2018;5(1):43-49

Copyright © 2018 by author(s) and Indian J Clin Anaesth. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) (