COVID-19 Update - This is to inform you that the Government of India has announced a complete lockdown in India 22nd March 2020 to 3rd May 2020. As a result, our offices will now be closed till 3rd May 2020 and all our employees will be working from home. Office telephones will not be answered, and therefore you are requested to direct all your queries related to manuscript submission, review process, publication etc. at below mentioned details.,, Mob. 8826373757, 8826859373, 9910947804

Print ISSN:-2394-4781

Online ISSN:-2394-4994


Current Issue

Year 2020

Volume: 7 , Issue: 1

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 562

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 200

Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia

A comparative study of intrathecal clonidine VS dexmedetomidine in caesarean patients

Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Author Details : Selvakumar Rajasekaran, Suresh Murugaih, Asha Anandan, Ayshvarya Ramalingam

Volume : 5, Issue : 1, Year : 2018

Article Page : 68-74

Suggest article by email


Introduction: Spinal anaesthesia is the most commonly employed technique for Caesarean section. Many drugs such as opioids as intrathecal additives such have been widely studied found to be associated with respiratory depression, pruritis, etc. Upcoming studies on alpha-2 agonists as intrathecal additives have been found promising and will replace opioids soon. Knowledge on the efficacy of the individual a2 agonists over one another is lacking. So the aim of the study is to compare the spinal additive effect of dexmedetomidine and clonidine in pregnant patients for caesarean section.
Materials and Methods: Ninety patients belonging to ASA group I and II of age group of 20 – 40 years were included in the study. Patients with PIH, Diabetes, Body weight above 100kg, Height less than 145 cm, Post spinal surgeries, spinal deformity, and known history of Coagulopathy and allergic to study drugs, documented IUGR, intrauterine anomaly and patients those who are not willing for spinal anaesthesia were excluded from the study. They were randomly allocated into three groups of 30 patients each, Group D where the patients received dexmedetomidine 5µg with bupivacaine 10mg, Group C where the patients received clonidine 15µg with bupivacaine 10mg and Group B where the patient received bupivacaine 10mg with 0.9% saline 0.5ml. The duration of the sensory and the motor blockade, two segment regression times, duration of the postoperative analgesia, sedation and neonatal wellbeing with maternal hemodynamic changes were studied.
Results: Demographic characteristics and hemodynamic parameters were comparable between the three groups. The onset and maximal sensory block was faster in Dxm and clonidine groups (162±41.40;166±37.57) than control group (254.67±28.73) which was statistically significant. The two segment regression time was significantly shorter in control group (67.53±5.94) than Dxm and clonidine group (103.47±8.08;108±6.90). Dxm and clonidine group showed shorter time (3.40±0.84; 3.13±0.50) to reach Bromage grade 3 motor block than control group (4.52±1.78). The maximum sedation score recorded in both Dxm and clonidine group was 2.The time of onset (minutes) of sedation between Dxm and clonidine groups which was (8.9±2.85;7.43±2.27 ) were statistically insignificant.
Conclusion: Addition of intrathecal clonidine 15µg/ dexmedetomidine 5µg to 10mg of bupivacaine in LSCS patients increase the duration of motor and sensory blockade, with little changes in maternal hemodynamics without any changes in neonatal outcome.

Keywords: Caesarean section, Clonidine, Dexmedetomidine, Spinal anaesthesia.

Doi : 10.18231/2394-4994.2018.0012

How to cite : Rajasekaran S, Murugaih S, Anandan A, Ramalingam A, A comparative study of intrathecal clonidine VS dexmedetomidine in caesarean patients. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2018;5(1):68-74

Copyright © 2018 by author(s) and Indian J Clin Anaesth. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) (