COVID-19 Update - This is to inform you that the Government of India has announced a complete lockdown in India 22nd March 2020 to 14th April 2020. As a result, our offices will now be closed till 14th April 2020 and all our employees will be working from home. Office telephones will not be answered, and therefore you are requested to direct all your queries related to manuscript submission, review process, publication etc. at below mentioned details.,, Mob. 8826373757, 8826859373, 9910947804

Article view: 432

Article download: 180

Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia

Comparison of channelled vs unchannelled video laryngoscope- A prospective randomised trial

Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Author Details : Shibani Padhy, Kavitha Jayaram*, Sindhuja Priyanka

Volume : 5, Issue : 4, Year : 2018

Article Page : 543-548

Suggest article by email


Introduction: Conventional laryngoscopy using the traditional Macintosh blade remains the commonest method of tracheal intubation in the routine clinical scenario. Video laryngoscopes have taken over this position in many scenarios as they have been proved successful over conventional laryngoscope. There are several types of video laryngoscopes available with multiple advantages over one another. We aimed to compare the performance of the Airtraq and McGrath when performing tracheal intubation in routine anaesthesia practice.
Materials and Methods: Sixty patients posted for surgery requiring endotracheal intubation were randomized to undergo intubation using an Airtraq (n=30) or McGrath (n=30) video laryngoscope. Primary end points were total duration of intubation, overall success rate of tracheal intubation, number of optimization manoeuvres used and ease of intubation between the two groups.
Results: We observed that the duration of successful intubation was shorter in Airtraq 19.18 (±2.86) secs) than in the McGrath laryngoscope.27 (±5.09) secs)* P < 0>A significantly better Cormack lehane view was obtained with the Airtraq. Grade I in 73.3% with the Airtraq group versus 50% in the McGrath group, p<0> Conclusion: We conclude that the Airtraq laryngoscope facilitates a more rapid and successful intubation as compared to McGrath in routine clinical practice.

 Keywords: Airtraq, McGrath, Intubation.

Doi : 10.18231/2394-4994.2018.0103

How to cite : Padhy S, Jayaram K, Priyanka S, Comparison of channelled vs unchannelled video laryngoscope- A prospective randomised trial. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2018;5(4):543-548

Copyright © 2018 by author(s) and Indian J Clin Anaesth. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (