COVID-19 Update - This is to inform you that the Government of India has announced a complete lockdown in India 22nd March 2020 to 3rd May 2020. As a result, our offices will now be closed till 3rd May 2020 and all our employees will be working from home. Office telephones will not be answered, and therefore you are requested to direct all your queries related to manuscript submission, review process, publication etc. at below mentioned details. editor@innovativepublication.com, rakesh.its@gmail.com, Mob. 8826373757, 8826859373, 9910947804


Print ISSN:-2394-4781

Online ISSN:-2394-4994

CODEN : IJCACT

Current Issue

Year 2020

Volume: 7 , Issue: 2

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 347

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 149

Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia


Prospective randomized controlled study to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine and pethidine on patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgeries


Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


Author Details : S Sindhuja*

Volume : 5, Issue : 4, Year : 2018

Article Page : 596-602


Suggest article by email

Abstract

Introduction: Spine surgeries, especially spine fusion surgeries cause severe postoperative pain, hampering convalescence. This is a randomized double blind controlled study comparing the analgesic efficacy of postoperative intravenous pethidine and dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgeries.
Materials and Methods: After connecting patients to vital parameters monitor, patients were given general anaesthesia, induced with fentanyl 2mcg/kg, propofol 2mg/kg in graded doses and rocuronium 0.6mg/kg to facilitate tracheal intubation. All patients received 1 gram paracetamol iv slow infusion intraoperatively. After one and a half hours of surgery, injection fentanyl 1mcg/kg was repeated. After extubation and shifting the patients to PACU, patients were randomly allotted either group P/pethidine group or group D/dexmedetomidine group by computerised randomization. Group P patients received injection pethidine 0.5mg/kg loading dose diluted in 5 ml of distilled water slow iv, followed by 0.15mg/kg/hr infusion for 24hrs. Group D patients received injection dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg bolus over 15 minutes followed by infusion of 0.5mcg/kg/min. Pulse rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, VAS score and sedation score were monitored every 5 minutes for first 15 minutes, every 15 minutes for 1 hour, every hour till 6th hour, then 12th hour, and 24th hour.
Results: Dexmedetomidine has a faster on set of analgesic effect (10 minutes) compared to pethidine (30 minutes), provides better analgesia and manageable hemodynamics but, causes more sedation with an average sedation score of 2.83 compared to pethidine.
Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is a better analgesic in the postoperative period compared to pethidine.

Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, Lumbosacral spine surgeries, Pethidine.

Doi : 10.18231/2394-4994.2018.0112

How to cite : Sindhuja S, Prospective randomized controlled study to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine and pethidine on patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgeries. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2018;5(4):596-602

Copyright © 2018 by author(s) and Indian J Clin Anaesth. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) (creativecommons.org)