COVID-19 Update - This is to inform you that the Government of India has announced a complete lockdown in India 22nd March 2020 to 14th April 2020. As a result, our offices will now be closed till 14th April 2020 and all our employees will be working from home. Office telephones will not be answered, and therefore you are requested to direct all your queries related to manuscript submission, review process, publication etc. at below mentioned details. editor@innovativepublication.com, rakesh.its@gmail.com, Mob. 8826373757, 8826859373, 9910947804

Article view: 272

Article download: 127

Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia


Are we glorifying the use of video laryngoscopes? A randomized control study comparing C-MAC(R) laryngoscope and McCoy blade for tracheal intubation in patients undergoing general anaesthesia with simulated immobilization of cervical spine


Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


Research Article

Author Details : Gunaseelan Mirunalini, Balasubramaniam Gayathri*, Meshak Dhas, Mohana Vatsalya Koka, Balaji Ramraj

Volume : 6, Issue : 3, Year : 2020

Article Page : 377-381


Suggest article by email

Abstract

Objective: Intubating patients with cervical spine injury is a challenge as the cervical spine is immobilized to prevent neurological damage. Although Fibre optic intubation is gold standard, many anaesthetist’s use video laryngoscope or McCoy blade for intubation. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of C-MAC(R) video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope with McCoy blade in intubating patients with cervical spine immobilization simulating cervical spine injuries.
Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients undergoing general anaesthesia were randomized into two groups. Intubation was attempted using C-MAC(R) video laryngoscope and McCoy blade after cervical immobilization using hard collar. Time to intubate, hemodynamic parameters and Intubation difficulty score was used to compare the groups.
Result: The laryngoscopic views and success of intubation was comparable in both video laryngoscope and Mc Coy group (30/30; 100% success in both the groups). The time to intubate was found to be less in McCoy group (29.83 ± 1.46 s and 25.67 ± 2.04 s) when compared to C-MAC (R) video laryngoscope. The intubation response was lesser in C-MAC compared to McCoy blade (82.97±7.23 s and 88.30±6 s). Time taken for the hemodynamic to return to baseline was the same in the groups (8.67±1.52 s and 9.13±1.25 s).
Conclusion: Direct laryngoscopy and intubation with McCoy blade is faster when compared to C-MAC(R) video laryngoscope; but with exaggerated intubation response].

Keywords: Laryngoscopy, Intubation, Cervical spine immobilization, Hemodynamics.

Doi : 10.18231/j.ijca.2019.072

How to cite : Mirunalini G, Gayathri B, Dhas M, Koka M V, Ramraj B, Are we glorifying the use of video laryngoscopes? A randomized control study comparing C-MAC(R) laryngoscope and McCoy blade for tracheal intubation in patients undergoing general anaesthesia with simulated immobilization of cervical spine. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2020;6(3):377-381

Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and Indian J Clin Anaesth. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (creativecommons.org)