COVID-19 Update - This is to inform you that the Government of India has announced a complete lockdown in India 22nd March 2020 to 3rd May 2020. As a result, our offices will now be closed till 3rd May 2020 and all our employees will be working from home. Office telephones will not be answered, and therefore you are requested to direct all your queries related to manuscript submission, review process, publication etc. at below mentioned details. editor@innovativepublication.com, rakesh.its@gmail.com, Mob. 8826373757, 8826859373, 9910947804


Print ISSN:-2395-1443

Online ISSN:-2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Current Issue

Year 2020

Volume: 6 , Issue: 1

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 707

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 205

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology


Endoscopic V/s External Approach DCR: A comparative Analysis


Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


Author Details : Rinky Saha, Prakash Kumar, Rajendra P. Maurya, Virendra P. Singh, Mahendra K. Singh, Rajesh Kumar

Volume : 1, Issue : 3, Year : 2015

Article Page : 137-142


Suggest article by email


Abstract

Aims & Objective: To compare the surgical procedures, intra-operative & post operative complications and overall success rate of Endoscopic Dacrocystorhinostomy (Endo-DCR) with External approach Dacrocystorhinostomy (DCR).

Materials & Methods: In this randomized, interventional, comparative study, 50 cases of mechanical Endonasal Dacrocystorhinostomy & 30 cases of conventional External Dacrocystorhinostomy were performed from January 2006 to April 2007 in the department of Ophthalmology in conjunction with department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sir Sunder Lal Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. All patients underwent detailed general, medical and ocular history as well as thorough ocular and ENT examination to rule out any nasal pathology. Level of blockage was diagnosed by lacrimal syringing & probing, Jones dye test and dacrocystography.
Surgery was done under local anesthesia except in children and uncooperative patients where general anesthesia was used. For Endo- DCR surgery, 0 & 30 degree rigid endoscope was used. In selected cases silastic sheet were used. The surgical outcomes and complications were analyzed.
Results: Functional success and symptomatic relief were equivalent in both procedures. Endo-DCR surgery was found to be quicker to perform than external DCR surgery. The follow-up duration was comparable in both groups. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the Endo -DCR group.
Conclusion: Endo-DCR surgery offers a very attractive alternative to the well established technique of external DCR surgery for the treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction with equivalent success rates, shorter surgical time and higher patient satisfaction.
 
Keywords: Chronic dacryocystitis, Endoscopic DCR, Epiphora, Endonasal DCR surgery, External DCR, Silicon intubation

How to cite : Saha R, Kumar P, Maurya R P, Singh V P, Singh M K, Kumar R, Endoscopic V/s External Approach DCR: A comparative Analysis. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015;1(3):137-142

Copyright © 2015 by author(s) and Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) (creativecommons.org)