Covid Alert


Print ISSN:-2395-1443

Online ISSN:-2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Current Issue

Year 2020

Volume: 6 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 103

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 68


Solu, Bhavsar, Patel, Korat, and Mavani: Evaluation of macula in high myopic fundus using optical coherence tomography


Introduction

Myopia is one of the major causes of visual impairment especially in Asia and Europe and has becoming increasingly prevalent.2, 1 High myopia affects up to 3% of the world population. The prevalence of myopia is reported to range from 17% to 43% among Asian population. The prevalence of high myopia is also greater in Asian population compared to that in Whites ranging from 1.7% to 9.1%.16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3

Vision loss related to high myopia is of great clinical significance as it is irreversible and affects individuals during their most productive years.  High myopia is defined as refractive error of at least -6.00D or an axial length of 26.5mm or more.  Pathological myopia is defined as myopia associated with posterior segment changes along with progressive and excessive elongation of the globe.17 High myopia can lead to complications such as posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and abnormal vitreoretinal interface, retinal detachment (RD), posterior staphyloma, macular hole, lacquer cracks, subretinalhemorrhage. All these can lead to visual disability. Apart from these pathologies, high myopic fundus also has higher incidence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) or vitreomacular traction. This can lead to myopic traction maculopathy (MTM) such as retinoschisis, lamellar holes, or shallow detachment.2

The purpose of this study was to evaluate various posterior segment changes in high myopia using spectral domain OCT. We have studied the relationship of the refractive error, and axial length of the eye with variations of macular thickness.

Materials and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study carried out in a tertiary care centre in South Gujarat. Informed written consent was taken from each enrolled patient. A total of 200 eyes of 100 healthy young patients were evaluated in the study and patients were divided into two groups: Group I had 50 patients with emmetropia [spherical equivalent (SE) =0D] and group II had 50 patients with high myopia. Exclusion criteria consisted of known glaucomaor with positive family history, other ocular pathology, past history of refractive surgery, neurological disease, diabetes mellitus. All subjects underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation which included visual acuity measurement by Snellen’s chart, slit lamp examination, fundus examination by slit lamp bio-microscopy and indirect ophthalmoscopy. The refractive error from the manifest refraction was adjusted to the SE. Axial lengths were measured using A scan biometer (EchoruleBiomedix). OCT was performed with TOPCON SD-OCT after pupillary dilation to a minimum of 5 mm diameter. Average macular thickness, central foveal thickness and total macular volume measured using 3D macula scan of all the cases and controls. Analysis of the collected data was done using SPSS version 23. Variables were expressed as mean± standard deviation. Data was compared using unpaired t-test.

Results and Discussion

The present study was conducted in a tertiary care center in south Gujarat. In this study we included 50 cases (100 eyes) and 50 controls (100 eyes).

In the present study, the mean age among the cases was 24.24 years (SD±4.706 years). The mean age among controls 25.88 was years (SD±5.630 years). The age of cases ranged between 17 to 36 years and in controls it was between 15 to 36 years. There was no significant difference among the ages of participants in both the groups (t=1.58, p=0.117). Leung C et al studied 115 myopic eyes of 115 subjects. The mean age was 35.9 ± 9.6 years and there was no significant difference of age among subjects.18 In study conducted by Song AP et al, theyincludeda total of 82 eyes of 82 subjects in their study out which 43 were males and 39 were females. They were divided into three groups according to their refractive status. The average age of the low and medium myopia group (LMMG), high myopia group (HMG) and super high myopia group (SHMG) was 26.62±5.38, 24.33±5.70 and25.82±5.68 old years, respectively.19

Table 1
Characteristics Cases Controls
Mean SE -8.76 D (SD ±-1.13D) Emmetropic
Mean Axial Length 27.40 mm (SD±0.99) 22.07 mm (SD±0.59)

Mean spherical equivalentand axial length among cases and controls

In present study the mean spherical error among cases was -8.76 D (SD±-1.13D). While controls were emmetropic. In study conducted by Song AP et al the mean refractive error in the low and medium myopia group (LMMG), high myopia group (HMG) and super high myopia group (SHMG) groups was -2.49±1.38D, -8.53 ±1.95D and -13.88 ±1.76D, respectively.19 In study conducted by Leung C et al, the mean spherical equivalent was -7.31 ± 3.04 D (range -0.75 to -13.88).18

In present study, the mean axial length among cases was 27.40 mm (SD±0.99) and among controls it was 22.07 mm (SD±0.59). In study conducted by Song AP et al the mean axial length was 25.81mm (SD ±2.31). The AL was ranging from 22.72mm to 31.50mm.19 In study conducted by Leung C et al, the mean axial length was 26.08± 1.33 mm (range, 22.73–28.79 mm).18

Table 2
Case/Control N Mean Std. Deviation t P value
Macular Volume Case 100 6.905 .72 12.008 .000
Control 100 7.8175 .23
Central Foveal Thickness Case 100 170.10 11.69 9.01 .000
Control 100 158.34 5.79
AVG Macular Thickness Case 100 214.67 45.75 12.58 .000
Control 100 274.34 12.49
Axial Length Case 100 27.40 .99 45.84 .000
Control 100 22.07 .59

Comparison of macularvolume, average macular thickness, central macular thickness and axial lengthin cases and controls

In present study the difference of macular volume, average macular thickness and central foveal thickness were found to be statistically significant between cases and control groups. Here macular volume and average macular thickness was less as compared to emmetropic subjects while central foveal thickness was increased in myopic subjects as compared to emmetropic subjects. Similarly, Waris A et al’s study showed that the mean macular thickness was significantly less in myopic eyes as compared to emmetropic eyes. The fovea was significantly thick (p<0.0001) in myopic eyes as compared to emmetropic eyes.20 Similar results were also seen in study conducted by Song AP et al macular thickness was significantly less in high and severely high myopic group as compared to low myopic group. But central foveal thickness was increased in high myopic group as compared to low myopic group.19 In study conducted by Wu PC et al, they found that highly myopic eyes had smaller mean macular volume than normal eyes. And high myopic subjects had greater central foveal thickness compared to normal subjects.21

In present study the spherical equivalent and central foveal thickness were found to be negatively correlated (ρ=-0.452) and this was statistically significant (p=0.00). Similar results like of our study were seen in studies conducted by Choi S et al,22 Lim MCC et al,23 Song AP et al.19 and Hwang Y et al.24

Conclusion

Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) allowed detailed evaluation of the macular area in eyes with high axial myopia & could even detect subtle myopic changes.

Average macular thickness and total macular volume decreases with increase in axial length and degree of myopia. Central foveal thickness increases with increase in axial length and degree of myopia.

The current normative database of OCT machines does not take refractive error in account, clinicians should be aware of the effect of this parameter and consider other clinical features while evaluating macular thickness in the diagnosis and monitoring of diseases such as diabetic macular edema, or after-cataract maculopathy.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

Aiko Iwase Makoto Araie Atsuo Tomidokoro Tetsuya Yamamoto Hiroyuki Shimizu Yoshiaki Kitazawa Prevalence and Causes of Low Vision and Blindness in a Japanese Adult PopulationOphthalmology200611381354136210.1016/j.ophtha.2006.04.022

2 

C C Klaver R C Wolfs J R Vingerling Age specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population: The Rotterdam studyArch Ophthalmol1998116653658

3 

R Dandona L Dandona T J Naduvilath Refractive errors in an urban population in southern India the Andhra Pradesh Eve Disease StudyInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci19994028102818

4 

S M Saw H Chany W L Wong Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in Singapore Malay Eye surveyOphthalmol2008115713719

5 

T Y Wong P J Foster J Hee Prevalence and risk factors for adult Chinese in SingaporeInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20004124862494

6 

S M Saw G Gazzard D Koh Prevalence rates of refractive errors in Sumatra IndonesiaInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20024331743180

7 

R BOURNE Prevalence of refractive error in Bangladeshi adults, Results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of BangladeshOphthalmol200411161150116010.1016/j.ophtha.2003.09.046

8 

A. Gupta R.J. Casson H.S. Newland J. Muecke J. Landers D. Selva Prevalence of Refractive Error in Rural MyanmarOphthalmol20081151263210.1016/j.ophtha.2007.02.025

9 

Sanjeewa Wickremasinghe Paul J. Foster Davaatseren Uranchimeg Pak Sang Lee Joe G. Devereux Poul Helge Alsbirk Ocular Biometry and Refraction in Mongolian AdultsInvest Opthalmol Visual Sci2004453776783

10 

Li Xul T Cui Refractive error in urban and rural Adult Chinese in BeijingOphthalmol200511216761683

11 

Akira Sawada Atsuo Tomidokoro Makoto Araie Aiko Iwase Tetsuya Yamamoto Refractive Errors in an Elderly Japanese PopulationOphthalmol2008115236337010.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.075

12 

Q Wang B E Klein R Klein Refractive status in the Beaver Dam Eye StudyInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci19943543444347

13 

Katz J M Tielsch A Sommer Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in an adult inner city populationInvest Opthalmol Vis Sel199738334340

14 

Karin Attebo Rebecca Q Ivers Paul Mitchell Refractive errors in an older populationOphthalmology199910661066107210.1016/s0161-6420(99)90251-8

15 

Matthew Wensor Prevalence and Risk Factors of Myopia in Victoria, AustraliaArch Ophthalmol1999117565865310.1001/archopht.117.5.658

16 

Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch Mei Ying-Lai Rohit Varma Myopic Refractive Error in Adult Latinos: The Los Angeles Latino Eye StudyInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20064751845184510.1167/iovs.05-1153

17 

Morito Takano Shoji Kishi Foveal retinoschisis and retinal detachment in severely myopic eyes with posterior staphylomaAm J Ophthalmol1999128447247610.1016/s0002-9394(99)00186-5

18 

C Leung S Mohamed K Leung Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in Myopia: An Optical Coherence Tomography StudyInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2006471251715176

19 

A P Song X Y Wu J R Wang W Liu Y Sun T Yu Measurement of retinal thickness in macular region of high myopic eyes using spectral domain OCTInt J Ophthalmol201471122127

20 

A Waris M Malakar S N Askari Optical coherence tomography assisted macular thickness profile in high myopiaIndian J Basic Appl Med Res201542159166

21 

P C Wu Y J Chen C H Chen Y H Chen Assessment of macular retinal thickness and volume in normal eyes and highly myopic eyes with third-generation optical coherence tomographyEye200822551555

22 

S W Choi S J Lee Thickness Changes in the Fovea and Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Depend on the Degree of MyopiaKorean J Ophthalmol2006204215219

23 

C Lim S Hoh J Paul Foster Macular thickness and volume of myopic eyes measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomographyClin Exp Optom201295492498

24 

Y H Hwang Y Y Kim Macular thickness and volume of myopic eyes measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomographyClin Exp Optom201295492498



jats-html.xsl

© 2020 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license (creativecommons.org)