Print ISSN:-2581-382X

Online ISSN:-2581-3838

CODEN : IIJMCP

Current Issue

Year 2019

Volume: 5 , Issue: 4

Article view: 598

Article download: 152

IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging


Comparative evaluation of cephalometric data obtained from manual cephalometry versus computer aided cephalometry


Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


Author Details : Jyoti Singh

Volume : 2, Issue : 3, Year : 2016

Article Page : 103-106


Suggest article by email

Abstract

Background: Digital cephalometrics is an amalgation of Traditional Cephalometry. The emergence of computerized cephalometry has develop the need to examine the advantages and drawbacks of Traditional method of cephalometric analysis.
Material and Method: The study sample consisted of 25 lateral cephalometric radiographs which were selected randomly from the data files.
Results: The results of this study assessed that hand tracing procedure was by far, the most time consuming, while digital method of tracing were faster and simpler.
Conclusion: The computerised cephalometric tracing method by digitization is more reliable and consistent as compared to manual cephalometric tracing method.

Keywords: 
Manual cephalometry, Computer aided cephalometry, Nemoceph imaging software, Cephalometric data, Cephalometric analysis

How to cite : Singh J, Comparative evaluation of cephalometric data obtained from manual cephalometry versus computer aided cephalometry. IP Int J Maxillofac Imaging 2016;2(3):103-106

Copyright © 2016 by author(s) and IP Int J Maxillofac Imaging. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (creativecommons.org)