COVID-19 Update - This is to inform you that the Government of India has announced a complete lockdown in India 22nd March 2020 to 3rd May 2020. As a result, our offices will now be closed till 3rd May 2020 and all our employees will be working from home. Office telephones will not be answered, and therefore you are requested to direct all your queries related to manuscript submission, review process, publication etc. at below mentioned details.,, Mob. 8826373757, 8826859373, 9910947804

Print ISSN:-2394-546X

Online ISSN:-2394-5478


Current Issue

Year 2020

Volume: 7 , Issue: 1

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 695

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 273

Indian Journal of Microbiology Research

Evaluation of rapid screening methods in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection

Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Author Details : Prakash N., Arundathi H. A., Halesh L. H., Siddesh K. C.

Volume : 5, Issue : 1, Year : 2018

Article Page : 20-23

Suggest article by email


Introduction: Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infection encountered in clinical practice. Even though urine culture is considered as the gold standard in detection of bacteriuria, many alternative screening methods like urine microscopy, chemical analysis using dipstick method and Gram’s staining have been evaluated which are more economical and rapid. Hence, this study was undertaken to evaluate various screening methods in the rapid diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections.
Objectives: To evaluate Gram staining of urine, leucocyte esterase and nitrite dipstick test methods in the rapid diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections.
Materials and Methods: All urine samples received at Microbiology laboratory, McGann hospital, attached to Shimoga Institute of Medical Sciences, during study period was subjected to Gram staining, leucocyte esterase and nitrite dip stick test along with culture. Results of these tests were compared to culture results. Sensitivity and specificity of the tests was determined taking culture as standard.
Results: A total of 560 urine samples were processed. Culture showed significant bacteriuria in 210 cases. The sensitivity of urine microscopy was 70.9%, leucocyte esterase test was 98% and nitrite test was 74.8%. Whereas the specificity of urine microscopy was 70%, leucocyte esterase test was 79.1% and nitrite test was 98.8%. Similarly, the sensitivity of combined leucocyte esterase and nitrite tests was 90.9% and specifity was 97.4%. Sensitivity and specificity of all the three screening tests combined were 95.7% and 94.8% respectively.
Conclusion: Screening tests such as, Urine microscopy by Gram’s staining, Leucocyte esterase and nitrite dipstick test in combination can be used routinely to exclude bacteriuria. Urine culture can be employed only in the screening tests positive cases and in symptomatic cases irrespective of test results, thereby making diagnosis of UTI cost effective and rapid.

Keywords: Bacteriuria, Leucocyte esterase, Nitrite test, UTI, Urine microscopy.

Doi : 10.18231/2394-5478.2018.0004

How to cite : Prakash N., Arundathi H. A., Halesh L. H., Siddesh K. C., Evaluation of rapid screening methods in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Indian J Microbiol Res 2018;5(1):20-23

Copyright © 2018 by author(s) and Indian J Microbiol Res. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) (