Print ISSN:-2394-2746

Online ISSN:-2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Current Issue

Year 2020

Volume: 7 , Issue: 1

Article view: 555

Article download: 165

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research


Induction with transcervical foleys versus iv oxytocin for trial of labor after cesarean(TOLAC)


Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


Author Details : Shikha Joshi, Sarita Dheeraj, Sunita Fotedar

Volume : 3, Issue : 3, Year : 2016

Article Page : 257-263


Suggest article by email


Abstract

Objectives: To compare efficacy and safety of induction with transcervical Foley’s catheter and low dose intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in a case of previous LSCS.
Methods: One hundred women at term gestation with one previous LSCS with no contradictions for VBAC, Bishop’s score < 6, willing for VBAC (after consent) were selected and divided into two groups of 50 each. Group A was induced with transcervical Foley’s catheter and group B of another 50 was induced with intravenous oxytocin.
Results: In foleys group induction-delivery interval was less 24.54±6.0 hrs compared to oxytocin group 27.88±7.08 hrs. Successful induction rate significantly higher (80% vs 66%) with foley’s as compared to oxytocin group. 76%  women delivered within 24 hours of induction in foleys group whereas in the other group 64% delivered within 24 hours. Both methods are safe for labor induction. No significant systemic complications like rupture uterus noted in both groups. Neonatal outcome was similar in both the groups.
Conclusions: Foleys induction and oxytocin induction are cheap, safe, easy methods with least systemic side effects like rupture or uterine hyperstimulation for labor induction in a case of previous cesarean compared to PGE2 gel though failure rates are more with only oxytocin.

Keywords:
 Intracervical foleys catheter, Oxytocin, Induction of labor, VBAC, TOLAC

How to cite : Joshi S, Dheeraj S, Fotedar S, Induction with transcervical foleys versus iv oxytocin for trial of labor after cesarean(TOLAC). Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res 2016;3(3):257-263

Copyright © 2016 by author(s) and Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (creativecommons.org)