COVID-19 Update - This is to inform you that the Government of India has announced a complete lockdown in India 22nd March 2020 to 14th April 2020. As a result, our offices will now be closed till 14th April 2020 and all our employees will be working from home. Office telephones will not be answered, and therefore you are requested to direct all your queries related to manuscript submission, review process, publication etc. at below mentioned details.,, Mob. 8826373757, 8826859373, 9910947804

Article view: 457

Article download: 171

IP International Journal of Periodontology and Implantology

Efficacy of ultrasonic mechanical instrumentation with and without chlorhexidine in treatment of chronic periodontitis

Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Author Details : Keshav A.*

Volume : 3, Issue : 3, Year : 2018

Article Page : 94-99

Suggest article by email


Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of ultrasonic mechanical instrumentation (UMI) along with the professional use of chlorhexidine (CHX) compared with UMI alone during periodontal supportive therapy in patients with chronic periodontitis.
Material and Methods: A total of twenty patients were included in the study and were divided into test and control group. The test group (ten patients) was treated with a single session of UMI along with subgingival irrigation under cavitation with CHX 0.02%. A 0.2% CHX solution was used for professional tongue brushing and mouth rinsing. The control group (ten patients) received a similar single session of UMI along with subgingival irrigation and professional tongue brushing and mouth rinsing with a control formulation. Clinical and microbiological parameters were assessed pre-treatment at 3 and 6 weeks post­treatment.
Results: Results showed that there was a significant reduction of supragingival plaque and gingival inflammation as well as a significant reduction of subgingival bacterial pathogens in both test and control groups. The additional use of CHX did not result in any additional clinical and microbiological benefit with respect to UMI alone.
Conclusion: CHX formulations in conjunction with UMI seems to produce no additional benefits over UMI alone during supportive therapy in chronic periodontitis patients.

Keywords: Chlorhexidine, Chronic Periodontitis, Piezoelectric Ultrasonic, Subgingival Microbiota.

Doi : 10.18231/2457-0087.2018.0021

How to cite : Keshav A., Efficacy of ultrasonic mechanical instrumentation with and without chlorhexidine in treatment of chronic periodontitis. IP Int J Periodontol Implantol 2018;3(3):94-99

Copyright © 2018 by author(s) and IP Int J Periodontol Implantol. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (