COVID-19 Update - This is to inform you that the Government of India has announced a complete lockdown in India 22nd March 2020 to 14th April 2020. As a result, our offices will now be closed till 14th April 2020 and all our employees will be working from home. Office telephones will not be answered, and therefore you are requested to direct all your queries related to manuscript submission, review process, publication etc. at below mentioned details. editor@innovativepublication.com, rakesh.its@gmail.com, Mob. 8826373757, 8826859373, 9910947804

Article view: 466

Article download: 153

Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology


Platelet count correlation: automated versus manual on peripheral smear


Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


Research Article

Author Details : Aashna , Deepti Mahajan*, Kuldeep K. Koul, Aditya Jandial

Volume : 6, Issue : 3, Year : 2019

Article Page : 381-387


Suggest article by email


Abstract

The assessment of platelet count is essential in clinical practice. The traditional method of estimating platelet counts from peripheral blood smears is a fairly accurate method and provides adequate quality assurance. Widespread use of automated analyzers based on impedance technology has resulted in an unprecedented improvement in accuracy and allows measurement of additional indices such as Plateletcrit (PCT), Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) and Platelet Distribution Width (PDW). However, both the methods have certain limitations.
Platelet counts were estimated on a 5-part Differential Automated Hematology Analyzer and manually on Leishman stained peripheral blood smears in 200 indoor patients admitted in Government Medical College Jammu to detect the correlation between the two. Estimation of MPV and PDW was done followed by a comparison with automated platelet counts.
The Mean Platelet Count, of the cases under study, given by the automated analyzer was significantly lower than the Mean Platelet Count estimated by manual method (P < 0>
However, the platelet count assessed by automated analyzer showed a strong correlation with manual platelet count (correlation coefficient, r = 0.857).
In thrombocytopenic patients, the platelet count assessed by automated analyzer, showed an inverse relation with Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) and Platelet Distribution Width (PDW).
It was concluded that automated hematology analyzer is crucial for quick and accurate complete blood count evaluation but all blood samples that show abnormal results or low platelet counts on analyzers should be confirmed by manual count on peripheral smear. The platelet indices like Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) and Platelet Distribution Width (PDW) can point to the underlying pathology especially in cases of thrombocytopenia.

Keywords: Platelet count, Automated haematology analyzer, Manual platelet count, MPV, Thrombocytopenia.

Doi : 10.18231/j.ijpo.2019.074

How to cite : Aashna, Mahajan D, Koul K K, Jandial A, Platelet count correlation: automated versus manual on peripheral smear. Indian J Pathol Oncol 2019;6(3):381-387

Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and Indian J Pathol Oncol. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (creativecommons.org)