COVID-19 Update - This is to inform you that the Government of India has announced a complete lockdown in India 22nd March 2020 to 3rd May 2020. As a result, our offices will now be closed till 3rd May 2020 and all our employees will be working from home. Office telephones will not be answered, and therefore you are requested to direct all your queries related to manuscript submission, review process, publication etc. at below mentioned details.,, Mob. 8826373757, 8826859373, 9910947804

Print ISSN:-2320-7302

Online ISSN:-2393-9834


Current Issue

Year 2019

Volume: 7 , Issue: 2

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 410

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 180

Journal of Dental Specialities

Piezoelectric surgery versus conventional rotary surgical technique for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A prospective study

Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Author Details : Pradeep PS, Sunil Sathigrama Malegowda*, Muhsina K, Pravitha S Anchan, Asal Irfan P

Volume : 6, Issue : 2, Year : 2018

Article Page : 92-99

Suggest article by email


Introduction: Impacted third molar surgery is a frequently performed procedure in clinical work. Surgical removal of impacted third molars is often required in symptomatic conditions. Conventional rotary cutting instruments may be potentially injurious, so piezosurgery has been introduced as a new osteotomy technique with promising outcome. Purpose of this study was to compare techniques of surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars using piezosurgery versus the conventional surgical technique. The parameters were time required, patient satisfaction, severity of pain and mouth opening postoperatively.
Materials and Methods: This prospective study consisted of 20 medically fit patients between 18–40 years of age with bilateral impacted mandibular third molars from both the genders. On one side surgical extraction was done using conventional rotary technique and contra lateral side was treated using piezosurgery (split mouth study design). Statistical analysis was done between these two techniques for patient satisfaction, duration of surgery, pain perception and trismus.
Results: Piezoelectric surgery took more time than rotary, but patient satisfaction, pain, mouth opening was statistically poor with conventional rotary technique.
Conclusion: Piezoelectric device is a promising, meticulous, innovative ultrasonic technique for safe and effective bone removal when compared with rotary technique.

Keywords: Piezoelectric surgery, Rotary surgical technique, Surgical removal, Mandibular impacted third molar.

Doi : 10.18231/2393-9834.2018.0024

How to cite : Pradeep Ps, Malegowda S S, Muhsina K, Anchan P S, Asal Irfan P, Piezoelectric surgery versus conventional rotary surgical technique for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A prospective study. J Dent Spec 2018;6(2):92-99

Copyright © 2018 by author(s) and J Dent Spec. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) (